The first thing that came to mind was that he'd be a big drain, so leaving exploration for later would be more dangerous as it mirrors the infestation getting worse without managing him I am at 0 deaths during my hard run thus far, with nodes upon nodes, health for days, and tonnes of ammo for my favourite weapons. Kowledgeable players will use this to extreme extents as I did with Dead Space 1 and 2, and mechanically skilled players also like myself, will be able to coast through the games confident in their resource management and knowledge of general balance and game systems, and reaching insane power levels early on. Dead Space isn't a survival horror, its a horror action, but both game genres often make the mistake of just "letting" you hoard resources and negate challenge throughout. You shouldn't be promoted hoarding resources, you should be trading them for progress or ease of progression. If you did all at once, you're maximising risk and rewardįor each level of security you obtain, and at each point you choose to clear each level, you'd be dealing with a greater risk the longer you take - On top of that, the hunter as an enemy gets to act more like he should.
If you did each security level as obtained, then you'd minimise immediate risk and reward. If you delayed it, you'd have actively more dangerous encounters due to his presence and enemies. If you were the kind of player to do that immediately, there is no risk for going back for only level 3 as enemies are all killed, and hunter does not pursue. This is great, there's a tangible risk and reward to investigating older areas.
I have but one major criticism of the remake thus far upon reflection, and that's the use of its level design and the hunter.īasically, I wish the hunter would pursue during back tracking after he shows back up after mining and obtaining level 3.Įnemies show up while back tracking for lvl 1 and lvl 2.
0 kommentar(er)
